Suggestions(1)
Exact(12)
The study employed an experimental design over a 6 month period with 34 students assigned to either an explicitly instructed group or a control group receiving no instruction.
The study employed an experimental design over a 12 week period with 26 students assigned to either an explicitly instructed group or a control group receiving no instruction.
In the instructed group, participants were asked to form positive sentence and avoid the negative alternative in the emotional blocks.
However, WMC scores did predict the proportion of well-formed sentences (negative or positive) formed in the task (z = 3.8, p<0.001), both in the spontaneous (z = 3.5) and in the instructed group (z = 2.7).
A first group was simply told to form grammatically correct sentences, eliciting the spontaneous avoidance of the negative alternative (spontaneous group); a second group, in contrast, was explicitly instructed to avoid forming negative sentences (instructed group).
As anticipated, participants avoided negative sentences in the spontaneous group (25% negative sentences, logistic regression z = −11, p<0.001) as well as in the instructed group (0.5% negative sentences).
Similar(44)
By contrast, the affective heuristic account predicts dissimilar perfusion patterns in the spontaneous and instructed groups, in accordance with the expected different nature of processes involved in effortful and spontaneous response elaboration.
We examined an intervention designed to improve group decision making and performance through instructing group members to search for information they already possessed that was relevant to a problem.
(Depending on time available, the teacher may want to instruct groups to consider only a few of the preceding variables).
At the time of the study, the first author (male) had a master's degree and one year of experience with instructing groups in this type of research settings.
Mr. Bin Laden personally instructed the group in the ways of jihad for three days.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com