Sentence examples for institutional classification from inspiring English sources

See Figure 1. Figure 1 An institutional classification scheme.

This guideline contains seven characteristics: objectives and scope of manual, needs for the measurement of innovation, basic definitions, TPP innovation activities, institutional classification, measuring aspects of the innovation process, measuring the expenditure on innovation, and survey procedures [17].

Women, first generation students and low-income students are sizeable proportions of the student population and, as is typical of our institutional classification, are over-represented as a proportion of the students enrolled (as compared with more selective institutions).

By labelling the request 'cosmetic', the panel indexes a common sense institutional classification system that, in the words of Mary Douglas "describes the way things are" [ 41], and the request easily loses its entitlement to funding.

At an institutional level, our classification offers breast centres a simple and practical means of obtaining a transparent profile and overview of the range of breast cancer surgical procedures they offer by determining the frequencies of operations of the various classification categories as percentages of total caseload.

We chose to rank 569 schools, covering a variety of institutional types and classifications.

Furthermore, at the supra-institutional level, our classification could be used for inter-hospital comparisons or even in the context of benchmarking systems to achieve greater transparency as regards the current situation and quality of care in the surgical management of breast cancer.

It is generally accepted that much institutional work on soil classification systems was nationally biased, especially in terms of practical land management.

There were institutional differences in the classification of malignancy grade.

Scholars have noted the pace of institutional change; Roland proposes the classification of institutions into "slow-moving" and "fast-moving" institutions (Roland 2004).

Results are presented according to their classification as individual, institutional, or policy level factors.