For instance, discrepancies arose between IRBs that appeared to reflect differences in institutional culture and history, and personalities of chairs and/or vocal members, more than in local community values per se, and thus do not seem to be the intent of the regulations.
Recently there has been an increased awareness of the role of the primary dentition in the development and occlusion of the permanent dentition [ 1– 3]; for instance, discrepancies in the occlusal characteristics of the primary dentition could lead to similar occlusal problems in the permanent dentition [ 2– 6].
In some instances, discrepancies in fold-induction can be explained by methodological differences since the array data were all normalized to the co-hybridized universal-RNA sample, while the PCR data were normalized to a β-actin probe (data not shown).
For instance, numerous discrepancies between reported mRNA sequences and the July 2003 human genome sequence (for the 22 autosomes and two sex chromosomes) have been discovered [1], although an estimated upper bound of approximately four discrepancies for every 10,000 bases might not seem dramatic at first sight.
For instance, these discrepancies could be reflecting the presence of post-transcriptional and post-translational regulation during nitrogen fixation and the design of proper experiments will be fundamental to discarding or accepting this hypothesis.
Firstly, although this study comprises the whole spectrum of ductal carcinogenesis, the lack of power may have inhibited the documentation of significant associations; for instance numerical discrepancies concerning DCIS may become significant in larger comparative studies (approximately 500 DCIS cases).
In the few instances where discrepancies are observed between rat data and the clinical indicators of abuse liability, rat self-administration data corresponds with NHP data in the majority of these cases.
Graft patency was documented in each instance, without discrepancy, with both modalities.
In the instance of discrepancy between the two observers, each mouse was counted as a half being in that category.
For instance a discrepancy may be related to potential methodological pitfalls in case selection, small study populations, heterogeneous therapy, inadequate follow-up and statistical analysis.
Furthermore, this study revealed that a multi-method approach unearths more details that are difficult to identify using a single method, for instance, the discrepancy between policy and what is practiced.
