Exact(5)
- Inspector 1. "I understood everything I had contact with.
- Inspector 1. "The tool should improve some of the interface elements.
- Inspector 1. "Yes, they were really clarifying; I had no trouble understanding them".
- Inspector 1. "Without the observer's influence it could be very difficult to use the tool without training.
- Inspector 1. Inspector 4 added that maybe it would be easier to carry out the inspection, if the Web DUE allowed an easy way to verify repeated Web page zones within a Web page.
Similar(54)
- Inspector 4. "The technique did not seem easy at all.
- Inspector 4. Inspectors also stated advantages and suggestions of the evaluation of paper based prototypes.
- Inspector 4. Regarding the Web DUE's verification items, Inspectors 1, 3 and 4 agreed that they were helpful when combined with the Web page zones (See quote from Inspector 4).
However, when asked about the technique's adequacy, one inspector (Inspector 3) found the technique inadequate.
Furthermore, Inspector 3 stated that some items did not help him decide whether there was a usability problem or not (See quote from Inspector 3).
- Inspector 3. Regarding the technique's perceived ease of use we found out that Inspector 4 found the technique very difficult.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com