Sentence examples for insignificant discrepancies from inspiring English sources

Clinically insignificant discrepancies were found in 19% of the cases.

We examined the kinds of discrepancies that occurred, to distinguish insignificant discrepancies from major ones that might limit the scope or accuracy of a vaccine effectiveness study.

It is obvious that the large N can make MSE easily reach the CRLB in spite of the insignificant discrepancy.

However, this minor issue pertaining to an insignificant discrepancy in the total area does not affect the resulting PAI indexes as they were calculated using the normalized numerical figures (refer to Eq. (4)).

We find at the wavelengths above 600 nm, the reflectance of 1 × 1 array of Si3N4 SWS as unit cell is almost consistent with unit cell of 2 × 2 array, meanwhile insignificant discrepancy occurs at wavelengths shorter than 600 nm.

No discrepancy; General remarks: comments on terminology, protocol design, etc.; Discrepancy insignificant from clinical point of view, not affecting the treatment and/or the quality of life; Discrepancy significant from clinical point of view, hypothetically affecting the treatment and/or the quality of life.

Discrepancy insignificant from clinical point of view, not affecting the treatment and/or the quality of life;   4.

The notes range from nearly insignificant details to major discrepancies and deliberate distortions.

After a year of systemic telemedicine-based peer reviews, the authors have estimated that clinically significant discrepancies were detected in 6% of all cases, while clinically insignificant ones were found in 19% of cases.

However, such numerically and proportionately small discrepancies may be insignificant in the setting of clinical trials with hundreds, and in some cases, thousands of participant patients.

The length data for nonmammalian studies showed mixed results, including statistically significant decreases in length in fruit flies and zebrafish, but the other two studies (in chickens and salmon) showed insignificant increases in length; these discrepancies, in part, justify our decision to rate the body of nonmammalian studies overall to be of "low" quality (Koustas et al. 2014).