Suggestions(1)
Exact(4)
For ligation, a constant 25 ng of vector was used, and varying amounts of insert ranging from 60 to 120 ng were tested for each size selection.
More than 90%% of the analyzed clones contained an insert ranging from 50 bp to 700 bp (Fig 1b).
The estimated size of the plasmid library was 2.5 × 105 independent clones, with a size distribution of cDNA insert ranging from 0.4 to 2 kb.
These issues can be monitored by various read-out parameters concerning both the 'host' cartilage and the embedded insert, ranging from the time course of molecule release into the supernatant, structural histological analyses and RNA production, as well as the neo-synthesis, status quo and/or degradation of matrix molecules.
Similar(56)
Interestingly, the insertion mutants display variable length of inserts, ranging from adding 4 to 12 amino acids corresponding to the 8 partially degenerate triples in the designed oligonucleotides.
Further analysis of recombinant clones indicated that sequence length was similar to that for pGEM-T Easy vector; inserts ranging from 350 to 3000 bp being efficiently sequenced.
For this purpose, we constructed a cDNA library of unfed B. microplus containing 1.8×106 independent clones, with inserts ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 kb in size.
For all samples, over 83% of the inserts (ranging from 83.6% to 86.9%) were mapped without errors; only a small fraction of the inserts were attributed to repeat regions (2.7 6.3%).
We first looked at the lengths of the sequences, which are illustrated in Figure 2. It is important to note that the 454 machine that was used can sequence only about 250 bp per read, whereas the genomic library was intended to have inserts ranging from 50 to 500 bp.
Insert amplification of all random clones from cDNA library revealed inserts ranging between 500 bp and 2000 bp, with an average size of 1250 bp.
After in vivo excision with E. coli strain SOLR, the cDNA libraries from PGCs contained inserts ranging from 0.5 to 3 kb (n = 18).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com