Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
Functional inputs were assessed at stimulus strengths of 0.1 1.3 mA (50 µs) repeated at 15-s intervals.
In the current-clamp experiments, intrinsic electrophysiological properties and synaptic inputs were assessed in Golgi cells either with zero holding current or with negative current injection so that the spontaneously spiking Golgi cells were hyperpolarized to subthreshold voltage values (−55 mV to −60 mV), similar to the resting membrane potential of the not-spontaneous Golgi cells.
Similar(58)
Expression of Smad3 and Sox17 inputs was assessed by immunoblot using cell lysates from transfections done in parallel to chromatin immunoprecipitations.
Orosensory input was assessed by recording from the metacerebral cell (MCC) in free-moving animals.
A ploughing tillage system with low organic input was assessed, for which the main crops were spring wheat, green pea, forage maize, along with cover crops of different legume and non-legume species.
The quantities of each input required were assessed and multiplied by the unit price of each input for the 10 year-intervention implementation period.
The uncertainties in input parameters were assessed and were propagated through the model using Latin hypercube sampling.
The normalised root-mean-square (RMSnorm) differences and errors in areas under the curves (AUCs) between the measured and estimated input functions were assessed.
Finally, the ranges of input parameters were assessed individually on the ranges of the net savings outcome generated by the simulation to generate a Tornado diagram.
Costs were assessed first by input categories, and then by allocating these inputs to activity categories (i.e. activity-based cost centers).
Synaptic function and neuronal excitability were assessed by recording input-output curves (10-150 μA stimulus intensity) and synaptic plasticity was tested by inducing paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) and long-term potentiation (LTP).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com