input was furnished

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "input was furnished" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are indicating that information or data has been provided or supplied. Example: "The report was completed after the necessary input was furnished by the team members."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was furnished with a pair of spartan single beds.

The New Yorker

The house is furnished sparely.

The New Yorker

As many as 5000 names were furnished.

The New Yorker

Breitbart's office had barely been furnished.

The New Yorker

Often, this evidence is furnished by competitors.

The Economist

An explanatory pamphlet is furnished by Radio Luxembourg.

The New Yorker

The common areas are furnished.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

AMENITIES: The unit is furnished.

The New York Times

No evening escorts are furnished.

The New Yorker

Will the home be furnished?

The New York Times

Numerical simulation results are furnished to validate the theoretical findings.

Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using more common alternatives like "provided" or "supplied" for better clarity and modern tone in general writing.

Common error

Avoid using "furnished" in informal contexts. It can sound overly formal or archaic. Opt for simpler terms like "given" or "provided" in everyday communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "input was furnished" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the action of providing or supplying input has been completed. This construction is grammatically sound but often perceived as formal or somewhat archaic. Ludwig AI confirms its usability.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "input was furnished" is grammatically correct but not frequently used in contemporary English. Ludwig AI indicates it is usable, but its formality may make it less suitable for everyday contexts. Alternatives like "input was provided" or "input was supplied" are generally preferred for clarity and modernity. The phrase is most at home in formal, scientific, or business environments where a higher level of formality is desired. Due to its limited usage, it's important to consider the audience and context when choosing this phrase to ensure effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

input was provided

Replaces "furnished" with the more common and straightforward "provided".

input was supplied

Substitutes "furnished" with "supplied", offering a slightly less formal tone.

data was furnished

Replaces "input" with the more specific "data", if the context involves data provision.

information was furnished

Uses "information" instead of "input" for scenarios where information is being supplied.

input was submitted

Changes "furnished" to "submitted", implying a more formal or official context.

feedback was furnished

Replaces "input" with "feedback", appropriate when the input is in the form of feedback.

contributions were furnished

Emphasizes the aspect of contributing something, suitable when the input is a contribution.

details were furnished

Uses "details" in place of "input" to specify that particular details were given.

the submission was furnished

Restructures to emphasize the submission itself being furnished, rather than the input.

the material was furnished

Replaces "input" with "material", indicating physical or tangible input.

FAQs

What does "input was furnished" mean?

The phrase "input was furnished" means that input, such as data or information, was provided or supplied. It's a somewhat formal way of saying that something was given.

What can I say instead of "input was furnished"?

You can use alternatives like "input was provided", "input was supplied", or "data was furnished depending on the context".

Is "input was furnished" grammatically correct?

Yes, "input was furnished" is grammatically correct. It uses the passive voice of the verb "furnish", meaning to provide or supply something.

In what contexts is "input was furnished" most appropriate?

The phrase "input was furnished" is most appropriate in formal or technical contexts. In everyday conversation, simpler alternatives like "input was given" or "input was provided" might be more suitable.