Sentence examples for input revealed from inspiring English sources

Comparison of expression profiles generated with the lower inputs to that obtained with the standard 100 ng input revealed average intensity correlations of R2∼0.91 for the 250 pg (Fig. 4B), and R2∼0.80 and 0.72 for the 50 pg and 10 pg inputs, respectively (Table 3).

The ratio of the calculated sample DNA copy number to the referenced calibrator DNA copy number at the same mass input revealed the fraction of sample templates that were competent for PCR amplification.

Immunoblotting of total cell lysates (Fig.  5B, input) revealed similar expression of the mitochondrial marker protein for Complex V (F1-ATPase α-subunit) and of desmin in Plec +/+ and Plec −/− myoblasts.

The reduced number of interneurons (Fig.  1), and the consequent decrease of GABAergic input revealed in specific hippocampal and cortical areas (Fig.  3) could increase the global excitability of these brain regions.

Manipulating the frequency of the sinusoidal input revealed that both IF IF and IF RES networks have "resonant circuit property" (Cardin et al. 2009), i.e. LFP power is maximal at stimulation frequencies around a certain characteristic frequency of the network.

RNA-Seq analysis of NSCLC-PDX CICs at the level of 10 cell input revealed clear CIC specific expression patterns with a strong link to previously documented stem cell and epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) profiles [ 21, 22], confirming the clinical usefulness of the methodology.

The comparison between EPIC results with different weather input reveals that the ECMWF data affects the EPIC model to underestimate NPP by 8% (Figure 2F).

Omitting normalization to the input reveals that increases in K36me1 start concomitantly with the peak of Cdc45 association and occur earlier in the Δrpd3 strain compared to the WT at the late ARS603 (Fig. S7).

The comparison between EPIC results with different weather input reveals that the ECMWF data affects the EPIC model to underestimate NPP by 8%.

Perhaps, the left out groups are less able to bargain as immediate consumption needs take priority as suggested by the results of Turner and Williams (2002), or possibly, the animals are in qualitatively worse condition due to the limited mobility and limited access to inputs revealed in the data analysis presented above.

Sensitivity estimates based on a 10% variation around the cost inputs revealed a total cost of the intervention ranging from $865.80 - $1058.20.