Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
For the case that the observer matching condition is satisfied, the influence of unknown input on residual is removed completely; if this condition is not satisfied, the influence of a part of unknown input is removed, and the influence of the other part is attenuated.
After this, input is removed and the behaviour of the network that results is then analyzed and classified.
R1 levels degrade to a level which permits production of R3 from P5. Stage 3. The input is removed (there has now been one oscillation in the input).
The system completes a full cycle: The input is removed again (there have now been two oscillations in the input), so there is no transcription from P1.
This network can maintain its current winner (state), even if the external input is removed.
If the input is removed, the system will return to the initial state.
Similar(50)
While the bipolar disorder and control groups had similar responses to manipulations of proprioceptive input (through changes in stance) overall, differences in sway dynamics between groups were particularly apparent when visual input was removed.
In particular, increased sway area and decreased ability to implement postural adjustments in the medio-lateral direction in the BD group were apparent compared to controls when visual input was removed.
The fact that the bipolar disorder group maintained high DFA α-values (indicative of reduced complexity) even when visual input was removed suggests that the BD participants were less able to make corrections to their sway pattern when no visual information was available.
The pattern of results observed in the control group, in contrast, indicated that sway dynamics became more complex when visual input was removed, consistent with previous studies indicating that visual information contributes to low frequency, longer time-scale postural adjustments [41], [42], [43].
Moreover, the bimodal distribution does not persist if the correlations in the input are removed after learning.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com