Exact(1)
When the results are analyzed, it can be seen that there is a significant and positive relationship between the teacher's innovativeness points and their points related to their attitudes towards the use of educational technologies.
Similar(59)
The average tendency is 1.37 points of innovativeness by one unit of efficiency (though it is not statistical accepted).
As suggested by Schumpeter (1934) and Mitton (1989), innovativeness is the focal point of entrepreneurship and an essential entrepreneurial characteristic.
Personal innovativeness represents the degree to which a person is willing to risk testing an innovation [ 47, 48].
Professionals sharing an interior landscape, show a consistent level of innovativeness and performance.
When referring to innovation, "(additional) value" is pointed out along with the "(real) innovativeness", whereby the former usually can only be evaluated some time after an innovation has been introduced.
In terms of the teacher's individual innovativeness characteristics, it was observed that innovator and early adopter groups had higher points in relation to their attitudes towards the use of educational technologies.
In addition, past studies found that a higher level of personal innovativeness can lead to greater intention to use new technology [ 51], and a direct and positive correlation exists between personal innovativeness and personal perception of new technology benefits [ 52].
In addition to examining general tendency to adopt innovation (i.e., innate innovativeness), this study adopted the scale for motivated consumer innovativeness (MCI) which was introduced by Vandecasteele and Geunes (2010) to measure different aspects of innate innovativeness.
What if formal innovation training actually improved firm-level innovativeness?
Subsequent to completing the focus group discussion, clinicians complete two further self-report measures: (1) Innovativeness Scale [ 21]: a 20-item measure using a 7-point Likert-type scale assessing the likelihood of an individual to adopt innovative strategies in their work.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com