Sentence examples for innovation protection from inspiring English sources

Furthermore, formal and informal innovation protection mechanisms should not be seen as mutually exclusive, since several are employed jointly.

The GPFI's financial inclusion plan (pdf), published when the group was launched, identifies nine areas of focus that are needed to bring about greater access to banking services: leadership, diversity, innovation, protection, empowerment, cooperation, knowledge, proportionality and framework.

Patents, then, are moving beyond their traditional roles of innovation protection and revenue-generation.

Innovations Have No limits - Innovative Protection For Vaccines Getting vaccines to children from where they are produced, to rural Pakistan, unspoiled, is possibly one of the most amazing accomplishments in modern public health that you have never heard about.

"Innovation without protection is philanthropy," said Mr. Rivette, a former vice president of intellectual property strategy for I.B.M.

He said that the national government's 1.18 trillion yuan, or $173 billion, contribution to the plan was a new investment in "public welfare, technological innovation, environmental protection and infrastructure projects.

While it is possible that this approach excludes many companies that are major innovators in their respective fields, it is the best measure we have to objectively evaluate corporate commitment to innovation and protection of intellectual property.

Politicians and regulators are trying to balance life-saving innovation with protection of the public given the emerging technology's limited track record.

"When they take things like inventory carrying cost, quality control, impact on innovation and protection of intellectual property into account, for example, they realize it's sometimes better to keep things at home".

This gives rise to a paradox of openness the creation of innovations often requires openness, but the commercialization of innovations requires protection.

Laursen and Salter (2014) explored a paradox of openness — the creation of innovations often requires openness, but the commercialization of innovations requires protection.