Exact(2)
The predicted inflow rates were higher at the front inlet than at the rear inlet due to non-uniform pressure distribution.
The relative velocity distributions at different phases in the monitor line near the guide vane inlet, due to the rectifying action of guide vane, are similar and steady.
Similar(58)
The vibration amplitude increases with the increase in inlet velocity due to the increasing fluid force.
Results indicate that the inviscid blade force is the inducement of the inlet CF due to geometrical asymmetry.
The unique parameter used to fit field data was the fraction of the inlet COD due to a superficial crust which did not follow anaerobic digestion.
No detectable leakage ratio was observed up to 20 kPa inlet pressure, due to the unique semi-circular valve seat design.
In Figure 3(a), the shell-side was divided into three sections including outlet section, middle section and inlet section due to the complex nature of shell-side geometry structure.
It is noticed that total outlet gas flow exceeds total inlet flow due to the formation of coke combustion products, an undersized standpipe, and inefficient placement of the air distributor rings.
The total pressure drop and its components seem to be independent from the system pressure but strongly dependent on the inlet temperature due to the influence of bulk-fluid temperature on the relevant thermophysical properties (density and dynamic viscosity).
The ventilation flow rates increased in the range of 40°⩽θ⩽60° for the incidence angle of the oncoming flow because the dynamic pressure at the inlet increased due to the change of the separated flow patterns around the model.
In turn, their share depends upon the longitudinal temperature gradient within the monolithic layer as determined by the heat generation in the inlet part due to propane combustion by oxygen, its transfer along the monolith layer and consumption in the rear part of the monolith in the absence of oxygen through endothermic reactions of dehydrogenation, cracking and steam reforming.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com