Sentence examples for injunction should be from inspiring English sources

At the high court, Marc Willers, on behalf of Dale Farm, argued that the injunction should be extended because moves to clear the site were legally flawed.

A Federal Appeals Court is expected to hear arguments on Friday from Apple about why such an injunction should be granted.

"Absent evidence [Henderson] proposes to engage in conduct which would constitute a contravention of the act, the injunction should be refused," the document states.

Nonetheless, most privacy cases so far have related to whether such an injunction should be granted and have not considered the question of damages.

The restraining order will remain in effect for two weeks, as lawyers prepare their briefs on whether the injunction should be extended.

It is not for a parliamentarian to ignore the careful and measured approach of a judge when deciding if an injunction should be granted.

The decision threw out a ruling by a federal appeals court that said injunctions should be automatic unless exceptional circumstances applied.

Although the court's earlier rulings suggested that injunctions should be subject to closer judicial scrutiny than a law, that is a disputed proposition that is one of the underlying issues in this case, Hill v. Colorado, No. 98-1856.

The issue at stake – whether injunctions should be upheld by the courts despite information being published on the internet outside the jurisdiction – will have far-reaching consequences for all future privacy cases.

Legislation replacing Taft-Hartley's archaic and one-sided injunction process should be introduced without delay.

The report is believed to suggest that a standard form of privacy injunction order should be drafted, providing a more rigorous and standardised approach to the process of granting gagging orders.