"inhibit freedom" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that constrains or limits the freedom of an individual or group. For example, "The government's intrusive surveillance program inhibits freedom of speech and expression."
Thought cops could inhibit freedom of research.
These admirers were ready to step forward and attack Lipstadt's character and her success in the courts on the grounds that it was likely to make others historians more cautious, and thereby to inhibit freedom of speech.
But Representative Mike Pence of Indiana, the No. 3 House Republican, said the measure could inhibit freedom of speech and deter religious leaders from discussing their views on homosexuality for fear that those publicly expressed views might be linked to later assaults.
"I think freedom of speech is such a fantastic cornerstone of our democracy, if we're going to get any laws that inhibit freedom of speech it's infinitely better that that's done in parliament than on the hoof by judges," he said.
Jonathan Tobin is right to point out that polygamy can inhibit freedom, though of course, bad heterosexual marriages can do that too; I'm not sure I buy the argument he cites that "[p]olygamy in all its forms is a recipe for social structures that inhibit and ultimately undermine social freedom and democracy".
Law professor David Strauss argues that the Affordable Care Act corrects market failures that inhibit freedom.
But they refused to allow Ipso to seek official recognition through a royal charter on the understanding that it also inhibits freedom of the press.
Adrian Jeakings, the chief executive of Archant, one of the country's local newspaper groups and owner of four daily local papers and 60 weekly titles, said he fears the system could "open the floodgates to compensation payments" and "would place a crippling burden on the UK's 1,100 local newspapers, inhibiting freedom of speech and the freedom to publish".
Last week, Adrian Jeakings, the chief executive of Archant, owner of four daily local papers and 60 weekly titles, said he feared that the new regulatory system could "open the floodgates to compensation payments" and "would place a crippling burden on the UK's 1,100 local newspapers, inhibiting freedom of speech and the freedom to publish".
Adrian Jeakings, chief executive of Archant, one of the country's local newspaper groups and owner of four daily local papers and 60 weekly titles, said he fears that the system could "open the floodgates to compensation payments" and "would place a crippling burden on the UK's 1,100 local newspapers, inhibiting freedom of speech and the freedom to publish".
Adrian Jeakings, chief executive of Archant, one of the country's local newspaper groups and owner of four daily local papers and 60 weekly titles, said he feared the system could "open the floodgates to compensation payments" and "would place a crippling burden on the UK's 1,100 local newspapers, inhibiting freedom of speech and the freedom to publish".
