Volcanic ash impact posters (a product of the Volcanic Impact Study Group ([2014]), commissioned by the Auckland Lifelines Group) provide accessible information for critical infrastructure stakeholders.
Because of this, infrastructure stakeholders typically think of their job as moving or supporting the movement of a physical thing from one place to another, be it water, electricity or goods.
3. Building on sound investment and infrastructure, all stakeholders (researchers, funders, government, industry and patients) must work together on the clinical development and translation of research knowledge to patient benefit.
Other issues impacting public health in these two countries include lack of access to clean water and sanitation, geographic isolation, inadequate infrastructure, low stakeholder engagement, weak healthcare capacity and limited availability of doctors and pharmacies.
However, it allowed to model the specific local context of a city quarter considering many factors in relation to urban energy planning like, e.g. available concerning energy consumption, available local and imported resources, energy standards, existing infrastructure, local stakeholder interventions, etc.
The participating organizations demonstrated shared commitment for planning, implementation, and evaluation; shared vision and objectives; infrastructure support; stakeholder engagement and buy-in; and strong leadership support in the development of this nurse-led model.
The organizations partnering in this research have demonstrated shared commitment for planning, implementation, and evaluation, shared vision and objectives, infrastructure support, stakeholder engagement and buy-in, and strong leadership support in the development of this nurse-led model.
For long-term success, geographically distributed infrastructure involving multiple stakeholders depends on the commitment of those stakeholders to support a vision and to adhere to standards agreed by the community.
The interrelatedness of the guidelines should be taken into account in the design, but feasibility (Infrastructure) and acceptability (Stakeholders) are also clearly important.
Aware of the many idiosyncrasies between islands and island nations with respect to governments, rules and regulations, infrastructure, multiple conservation stakeholders, etc., it is outside the scope of this Point of View to give specific case studies.
Combining qualitative information from experts with quantitative data in spatial conservation prioritization is not only required by the methods themselves, but also facilitates the uptake of scientific information by introducing concepts of SCP and green infrastructure to various stakeholders (Lehtomäki and Moilanen 2013; Kopperoinen et al. 2014).
