Sentence examples for infrastructure formation from inspiring English sources

In this paper, we propose a novel infrastructure formation scheme for wireless mobile ad hoc networks.

In this situation, the bottom-up dynamic of infrastructure formation can be considered a function of the settlement housing dynamic.

However, the scope of this study is only limited to study of the first category of the abovementioned dynamics of organic transport infrastructure formation by a group of people; from now on, we will refer to this as informal transportation infrastructure formation, informal infrastructure formation, informal trail formation, informal path formation or simply trail formation in this paper.

Considering a flat, obstacle-free and uniform environment in the first step, we focused on the informal infrastructure formation on complex terrains.

In this section, we aim to review the important physical, psychological and cognitive behaviors of humans in the process of informal infrastructure formation on sloped terrains.

In this paper, some important spatio-temporal aspects of the informal infrastructure formation phenomenon that are necessary for developing a conceptual model of this phenomenon have been reviewed and studied.

It is shown that PA-VBS scales well to large networks of mobile stations, and that it outperforms other infrastructure-formation protocols in terms of load balancing.

To understand and describe the dynamic of the informal infrastructure network formation, our strategy in this critical review is to simplify the dynamic of the system by breaking down the informal path formation process into simple sub-dynamics, behavioral rules and environmental configurations.

The design of traffic infrastructure foundations formations has traditionally been empirically rather than analytically based, and for the advanced methods currently in use, input parameters are typically determined from cyclic triaxial testing.

We highlight the influence of infrastructure on the formation of travel preferences.

This distinction matters because of the (i) influence of infrastructure on preference formation, (ii) health benefits from non-motorized mobility, (iii) negative impact of commuting on happiness and (iv) status-seeking behavior of individuals.