Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(41)
21 UK government guidelines state that "any researcher is faced with considerable difficulty" in selecting information for informed consent, "given the disagreement on how much information potential participants in research want".
The participants were informed verbally and in writing about the study by the midwife/social worker and oral informed consent given to the same person was considered sufficient.
There was no informed consent given to access that data.
It was done on a voluntary capacity with informed consent given.
A waiver was obtained for written informed consent, given that the described interventions were considered to be part of standard care.
Inclusion criteria were an expected length of stay in the ICU of at least 72h, age ≥ 18 years, and availability of informed consent given by patient or legal proxy.
Similar(19)
Key to this is informed consent, giving patients more say in their dealings with the NHS.
At study recruitment, participants were asked for informed consent giving investigators access to their driving records maintained by the SAAQ.
All patients gave written informed consent before giving blood and bone marrow samples.
Informed consent was given by the patients.
Informed consent was given by legal proxy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com