Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
Studies without sufficient information were scored "unclear".
Studies without providing sufficient information were scored "unclear".
Studies without sufficient information were scored the study as "unclear".
Participants with insufficient available clinical information were scored as missing data.
In addition, a BLAST search was performed for these sites and hits held in common between the marker and cloning information were scored as well.
Similar(54)
Throughout this study, the RCOG guidelines and their supplementary patient information have been regarded as 'gold standard' [ 3, 8], with website information being scored against this.
Heuristic and transmission information levels were scored as medium, whilst attitudes, norms, and intentions were fairly positive (x ¯ = ~ 26; range = 7-35).
Studies without sufficient information to judge were scored "unclear".
These were scored using information from the health management information system (HMIS).
Studies without sufficient information to make a judgment were scored "unclear".
The amount of information given was scored out of 50; the mean score was 37.38, s.d.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com