Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(12)
Model-finding received an average rate of 9 (standard error of the mean: 0.31), while model information was rated 8.4 on average (standard error of the mean: 0.34), as shown in Fig. 21.
Trustworthiness of the interview (i.e. the cooperativeness, consistency, and confidence of the partcipants in reporting the information) was rated by the psychologist on a 5-point scale: "very good", "good", "sufficient", "insufficient", and "difficult to evaluate".
Quality of information was rated using the validated DISCERN questionnaire.
Evaluation of quality of information was rated on scales between 0 (none received) and 5 (excellent).
The reports' information was rated good to very good in 74.3% of cases.
Provision of information was rated as lacking, insufficient, only a few key points provided, several key points provided, and thorough.
Similar(48)
The Netflix algorithm is guided by both implicit and explicit data, but the implicit information is rated more heavily.
Karnofsky performance score, treatment status and some other clinical information were rated by the referring oncologists.
Meanwhile, progress in the priority areas of the adaption of delivery systems, community mobilization, and strategic information were rated at 52%%.
Adaptation of delivery services, community mobilization and strategic information were rated at 52%% and the provision of point-of-care diagnostics and monitoring tools 38%%.
The formal (expert) content validity assessment resulted in item 1 (give new knowledge or information) being rated at an unacceptable level overall with respect to its relevance to CRU.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com