Sentence examples for information items to from inspiring English sources

We calculated a Cronbach's alpha coefficient for these nine dichotomous information items to explore whether these nine items form one scale.

A cross-sectional survey was administered in which participants were asked to rate the importance of 42 information items to their decision-making about birth facility.

Specifically, the relative importance of different information items to this group of women can be used to prioritise a list of indicators on which to provide specific facility information.

In the first step, the women assign the information items to the following categories: (1) in favour of mammography screening; (2) neither for nor against such screening; and (3) against the screening.

This descriptive paper summarises the findings of a cross-sectional survey in which women in Queensland who were pregnant and/or had recently had a baby were asked to rate the relative importance of 42 different information items to decision-making about birth facility.

Participants were asked to rate the importance of each information item to their decision-making about where to birth, using a five-point scale (1 = extremely unimportant, 2 = unimportant, 3 = neutral, 4 = important, 5 = extremely important).

The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDIER) [ 27] was used to identify information items considered to be specific to the reporting of the intervention, and the CONSORT statement (excluding item 5, intervention) was used to identify information items which were considered to be related to the study design/methodology and confounding issues [ 11].

We found significantly better ranking of all the information items according to norm perception compared to current practice perception.

In the theory of belief functions, a sound way to combine conjunctively multiple information items is to design a combination rule that selects the least informative element among a subset of belief functions more informative than each of the combined ones.

Two authors independently assessed study quality using a modification of the Newcastle Ottawa scale, and rated studies on 10 items in three areas: adequacy of description of the cohort (items 1 to 3); representativeness (items 4 to 7); and adequacy of follow-up information (items 8 to 10).

The most widely valued information items related to policies about support people, other women's recommendations about the facility, freedom to choose one's preferred position during labour and birth, the aesthetic quality of the facility, access to on-site neonatal intensive care, postnatal care and support, policies related to medical intervention, and access to water immersion.