Sentence examples for information difference from inspiring English sources

Motion information difference.

Due to this representation of we can express the mutual information difference, given in (14), in the following manner: (15).

Ensuring concurrent multiple PD progress [4, 5], and managing the information difference and similarity of multiple products are the key problem of concurrent multi-product development project management.

Therefore, we define motion information difference (MID) between two consecutive frames i and i – 1 as: MID = H GEM i − H GEM i − 1 + H JEM i − H JEM i − 1 + H LEM i − H LEM i − 1 (12).

The product information clustering technologies based on DSM were also presented [21, 22, 23], DSM was adopted to cluster product components into modules with minimum interfaces externally and maximum internal integration, but these model aimed for information interaction in the single product, lacked the research about the information difference and similarity among multiple products.

Although point estimates are available, there is clearly a substantial information difference between a heritability of 47% with a 95% CI of 44 50% and the same heritability with a 95% CI of 10 85%, and we expect that studies included in this review are more like to the second situation, limiting the utility of the reported estimates.

Since different investors understand information differently, differences exist in the realized value of the signal.

In the case of written information, differences in QI score between hospitals could have been due to different documentation processes rather than to genuine lack of information and/or cooperation between healthcare providers.

If we consider retweets as a measure of adoption of information, differences in adoption behaviour would indicate differences in perceived credibility of information.

A histogram of the match information differences log LR1)−log CLR) for these 25 comparable cases is shown (Figure 5b), having a mean increase of 7.90 log LR units and a standard deviation of 2.25.

A histogram of these information differences for the 23 comparable cases is shown (Figure 5a), having a mean improvement of 8.57 log LR units and a standard deviation of 2.10.