We considered four methods: 1) window-specific and simultaneously adjusted regression; 2) multiple informant models; 3) using features of individual exposure patterns to predict outcomes; and 4) models of population exposure patterns depending on the outcome.
Given the sample size for cross informant models in this study, it is not safe to draw firm conclusions about gender differences in the covariance of anxiety and depression when depression is self rated.
With this in mind, the same family functioning was also included in a cross-informant model.
At the same time, in common with the informant design model, it questions the extent to which equality can exist within an intergenerational team.
Interview informants identified a range of potential formal and informal models for cooperation.
In the biological model, informants viewed their symptoms as part of the whole disease process and they were eager to consult medical personnel for treatment.
For the dominant model, informants rated eight different aspects about perceived problems; continuity of care, efficiency of the model, accessibility, coordination of care, satisfaction of physicians and other professionals, patient satisfaction and safety of triage.
Attributes of these models were closely interrelated, but certain features and aspects belonged to specific groups as demonstrated in table 3. Informants in this model said that their symptoms were due to social events in their lives, either single episodes or long-term stressors.
They were offered money, the lawyers said, by a polished government informant who drove late model cars, paid for their meals and travel and promised more money when the job was done.
Variables removed from the model were: Informant rated self-concept, NPI-Q-distress relating to agitation/aggression and age.
