Simulation experiments determine which variables most strongly influence response time and throughput.
However, this assumption has been refuted on several occasions with the recognition that several other features of an item will influence response time [ 6, 10, 11].
Findings here do not depend on attention remaining fixed on the presented words in the attended location, given that the presence of a threat word in either location influenced response times.
Furthermore, the phase of a dominant rhythmical electroencephalographic (EEG) activity recorded in healthy humans is shown to influence response times to visual stimuli [ 2, 3].
However, since both orientation and distortion influenced response times, this suggests that the depth of holistic processing also depends upon the degree to which the stimulus appears "face-like", with more natural faces engaging more deeply in holistic processing.
Oxytocin did not, however, influence response time, accuracy, or gaze toward angry or happy faces, even when participants were separated into high- and low-social anxiety.
Results indicate that caregiver status, including being a parent, influences responses in time trade-off health state valuation.
Schmitt, Schmitt& Clapham (2001, 64) point out that the linguistic, cognitive and cultural background of participants influences their response (time and/or accuracy) to vocabulary tests.
One previous study examined the extent to which being a mother of a young child influenced responses to time trade-off (TTO) utility assessment [ 15].
Although this is clinically intuitive, it does not take account of factors which may influence response at a later time point such as host immune response and spontaneous lesion regression [19].
There are several factors that influence the response time of a detector, such as transit and diffusion time scales of photo-carriers inside and outside the depletion region, and the RC delay (PN-junction photodiodes assumed).
