Governance of the energy sector can be considered a mixture of these four institutional logics that form a set of interrelated incentives and constraints, which are likely to influence agent's behaviour and strategies.
Recent theoretical analyses have shown that the structure of networks, as well as positions of agents within them influences agents' overall outcomes on dimensions such as information diffusion and risk sharing, among others (Bloch et al. 2008; Jackson et al. 2012; Banerjee et al. 2013).
To lower the temptation of being compromised by bribes and other influences, agents will be paid well and they will have to agree to submit to random drug tests, psychological evaluations, and wiretapping.
The means through which these influencing agents act vary depending on the type of opinion leader.
Influencing agents such as opinion leaders also affect the disconnection between formal rules and reality of decision making.
These interactions can be complex as the action of even a single agent can influence other agents and vice versa.
The linear stacking of π π bonded protonated 2-amino-4-picoline molecules can be thought as the influencing agent for the organization of [Cu NTA 2] units into hydrogen bonded layers.
The mutual influence between agents depends on organizational parameters, which, in a first case, agents themselves can regulate, and, in a second case, an organizational designer can control.
That last recommendation seemed aimed at further reducing the influence of agents.
