inflammatory remarks

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "inflammatory remarks" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe comments or statements that are likely to provoke strong emotional reactions, often anger or outrage. Example: "The politician's inflammatory remarks during the debate sparked widespread criticism and protests."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Bruszewski denied making inflammatory remarks.

The New York Times - Sports

Mr. Beck is often accused of making inflammatory remarks.

The New York Times

Like her father, she has appeared in court on charges arising from her inflammatory remarks.

The Guardian

For congressional Republicans, Mr. Trump's inflammatory remarks are a vexing challenge.

The New York Times

Such inflammatory remarks are not uncommon from the prince and certainly not confined to Nouvel.

The Guardian - Opinion

*He made angry and inflammatory remarks about university officials and trustees.

The New York Times - Sports

The late-season slide that year, coupled with his own inflammatory remarks.

The New York Times - Sports

(Examples might include: poor housing conditions, unemployment, inflammatory remarks from the Interior Minister, and racism).

The New York Times

Others said they were appalled by what they heard as inflammatory remarks.

The New York Times

At times, both coaches have spouted inflammatory remarks that have added to the ill will.

The New York Times - Sports

The report said Amcu members sang provocative songs and made inflammatory remarks, which tended to aggravate an already volatile situation.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "inflammatory remarks", consider the specific context and audience to ensure your language accurately conveys the intended meaning without unnecessarily escalating tensions. Opt for more neutral language if the goal is to inform rather than provoke.

Common error

Avoid using "inflammatory remarks" when describing statements that are simply controversial or debatable but not intended to incite anger or violence. Choose more neutral terms like "disputed claims" or "contentious points" in such cases.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "inflammatory remarks" functions primarily as a noun phrase, where "inflammatory" acts as an adjective modifying the noun "remarks". Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. It commonly serves to identify and categorize statements that are considered provocative or likely to cause strong negative reactions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "inflammatory remarks" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe statements designed to provoke strong emotional reactions, as validated by Ludwig. Predominantly found in news and media contexts, this phrase carries a neutral register despite the often negative implications of the remarks it describes. Ludwig's analysis shows a wide range of alternative phrases, such as "provocative statements" and "incendiary comments", which can provide subtle variations in meaning. When using "inflammatory remarks", consider the potential impact and ensure it accurately reflects the intent and effect of the statements in question.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

provocative statements

Focuses on the act of provoking a reaction, whether intentional or not.

incendiary comments

Emphasizes the potential to ignite conflict or strong emotions.

divisive words

Highlights the polarizing effect of the language used.

contentious assertions

Suggests that the statements are likely to be disputed or debated.

controversial statements

Indicates that the remarks are subject to public disagreement and scrutiny.

offensive language

Highlights the potential to cause hurt feelings or disrespect.

polarizing comments

Focuses on how comments push people apart.

fiery rhetoric

Focuses more on the style and passion with which the remarks were delivered.

scathing criticisms

Emphasizes the harsh and critical nature of the remarks.

vitriolic pronouncements

Suggests a highly bitter and caustic tone in the statements.

FAQs

How can I use "inflammatory remarks" in a sentence?

You can use "inflammatory remarks" to describe statements that are likely to provoke anger or strong negative reactions. For example: "The politician's inflammatory remarks sparked widespread protests."

What are some alternatives to "inflammatory remarks"?

You can use alternatives like "provocative statements", "incendiary comments", or "divisive words" depending on the context.

What makes remarks "inflammatory"?

Remarks are considered "inflammatory" when they are designed or likely to cause anger, outrage, or strong emotional reactions in others. They often involve sensitive topics or use loaded language.

Is it always negative to use "inflammatory remarks"?

Yes, the term "inflammatory remarks" typically carries a negative connotation, suggesting that the statements are harmful or counterproductive. However, the degree of negativity can vary depending on the context and intention.