"infinite growth" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used in various contexts, but it is mostly used to refer to the concept of continuous and unlimited expansion or development. Example: Many economists argue that pursuing infinite growth is unsustainable and will ultimately lead to negative consequences for the environment and society.
Taken together, our results show that the spontaneous dynamics of genome size naturally prevents it from growing infinitely, even in cases where intuition would suggest an infinite growth.
They see that infinite growth is science fiction.
Infinite growth on a finite planet is not possible.
You can't have infinite growth in a world of finite resources.
In a world of finite resources, is it sensible, or even possible, to plan for infinite growth?
Anyone who thinks that you can have infinite growth in a finite environment is either a madman or an economist.
In the last few decades, humans have finally started to understand and accept that industrialization and infinite-growth capitalism those systems that have given some of us in the developed nations the luxuries of modernity have also increased atmospheric greenhouse gas levels to the point where we're all headed toward a hotter, more unstable home planet.
In the last few decades, humans have finally started to understand and accept that industrialisation and infinite-growth capitalism – those systems that have given some of us in the developed nations the luxuries of modernity – have also increased atmospheric greenhouse gas levels to the point where we're all headed toward a hotter, more unstable home planet.
Since it is both theoretically and practically impossible to increase resource use efficiencies indefinitely, it is equally impossible to have continued and infinite economic growth without a concomitant increase in resource depletion and environmental pollution, i.e., economic growth and resource depletion can be decoupled to some degree over the short run but not the long run.
But just how huge does one person need to be? Infinite personal growth is no more sustainable than infinite economic growth.
Despite its obvious contradiction, we assume infinite material growth on a finite planet.
