Sentence examples for inference trials from inspiring English sources

This can be best achieved by contrasting more distant pairs (inference 2 trials) to less distant pairs (inference 1 trials) in inference trials; inference 2 trials involving higher integrative demands than inference 1 trials, while both types of trials have a very similar learning status (unlike direct trials which were first presented (and tested) during the learning session).

Importantly, there was no difference between reaction times for inference trials and direct trials (Table 1), supporting the idea that the consolidation of associative memory involved the integration of discrete events (i.e., generalization of memories) rather than sequential inferential reasoning (Shohamy and Wagner, 2008).

In inference trials, participants were also presented with a cue picture and had to select which of two pictures belonged to the same series as the cue picture, but for pairs of pictures that were more distant in the series (i.e., separated by one or two intermediate pictures; Figure 1C and Figure 1 figure supplement 1C).

For simplicity, we will call this trial the inference trial.

This correlation was specific for activity on the inference trial.

In a, all significant updating occurred on the inference trial, whereas in b, all significant updating occurred between the inference trial and the end of the block.

As shown in Fig. 9, in the small-choice group, inference signalling was significant on the inference trial, but did not change significantly between the inference trial and the end of the block.

We eliminated all cases in which a free-choice trial occurred before the inference trial on the same side, because that free-choice trial would have had the same reward as one on the inference trial.

The inference trial was therefore the first trial of the block in which reward was delivered at that well.

Conversely, when there was less evidence that rats were aware of the block change, the inference trial itself showed no evidence of updating, and instead all significant updating happened between the inference trial and the end of the new block.

Conversely, in the zero-small-choice group, neurons did not show significant changes in activity on the inference trial, and all updating occurred between the inference trial and the end of the new block.