Sentence examples for inference of differences from inspiring English sources

Even if sequencing data avoid several noise issues related to microarray data, as background and cross-hybridization noise, they still need an estimate of the biological variability within the groups, otherwise there is no statistical basis for inference of differences across time and between different experimental conditions [ 3].

However, the spectra also have structure (Steuer, 2006; Rogers et al., 2009) that is useful for the inference of differences between groups of samples.

Undetected chimeras may be misinterpreted as novel species, causing inflated estimates of diversity and spurious inferences of differences between populations.

The data that are normalized to initial blood glucose values were used for the precise, time-point-specific p-values reported, yet the inferences of differences amongst groups do not depend on the use of these normalized data.

According to the Federal Circuit, a person aiming to copy [*33] or aiming to avoid a patent is imagined to be at least marginally skilled at copying or avoidance, and thus intentional copying raises an inference--rebuttable by proof of independent development--of having only insubstantial differences, and intentionally designing around a patent claim raises an inference of substantial differences.

According to the Federal Circuit, a person aiming to copy or aiming to avoid a patent is imagined to be at least marginally skilled at copying or avoidance, and thus intentional copying raises an inference--rebuttable by proof of independent development--of having only insubstantial differences, and intentionally designing around a patent claim raises an inference of substantial differences.

The procedures for making inferences on differences in the proportions of successes using independent as well as dependent samples from two binomial populations are also provided.

A likely explanation for the observed discrepancies in phylogenetic relationships among the major groups of heterokont algae concerns the sensitivity of inferences to differences in both ingroup and outgroup sampling [13].

Aetiological inferences on differences in %DV are hindered by the absence of information on BMI.

The WSRT procedure consistently reduced the number of significant inferences for differences between county and overall state rates when the comparisons involved relatively common cancers (large numbers).

This procedure takes account of autocorrelation when fitting the lines and testing the differences, and provides better control of type I error (i.e., an erroneous inference of a significant difference between phases/stages in experiments) than does visual inspection and has acceptable power.