inference is invalid

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "inference is invalid" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it in contexts where you are discussing logical reasoning, arguments, or conclusions that do not follow from the premises provided. Example: "The argument presented is flawed because the inference is invalid, leading to a false conclusion."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Later, I come to believe that this inference is invalid, yet also come to believe that all Nobel Prize winners in literature are great poets and that Neruda won the Nobel prize in literature.

SEP

Frege does not go out of his way to demonstrate that the crucial inference is invalid, but seems to take his point to have been essentially made once he has pointed out the need for a justification here.

SEP

However, this inference is valid only if it is valid to go from 'there is some explanation of p' to 'some feature of the situation explains p' and this inference is invalid.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Both views are theologically suspect, of course, and William argued that both inferences are invalid.

SEP

In one school of thought, scholars such as Simar and Wilson [40] argue that because DEA output scores are biased and contextual/environmental variables are correlated to output and input variables, the conventional statistical inferences are invalid in the second-stage regression, and recommend use of bootstrap methods.

Health Economics Review

Yet, as the previous criticisms of objections to natural-law arguments for avoiding/preventing DT reveal, the alleged "free-market" objection fails to justify allowing avoidable DT because its premises are factually false, and its inferences are invalid.

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

In one school of thought, academics such as Simar and Wilson [ 38] argue that since DEA output scores are biased and environmental variables are correlated to output and input variables, the conventional statistical inferences are invalid in the second-stage regression, and recommend use of bootstrap methods.

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

That the inference is logically invalid is (as is so often the case) no barrier to its being made.

SEP

If the assumption of no unmeasured confounding does not hold, however, any inference from an observational study is invalid, and the issue of power should not be relevant.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

If the evolutionary rates of genes are strongly influenced by features outside of domains, such as the number/length of linker regions, then the inference would be invalid.

Biology Direct

Michael Slote (1982) attempted to refute the Consequence Argument by showing that the inference principle upon which the argument relies is invalid.

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "inference is invalid", ensure you can clearly articulate why the connection between the premise and conclusion is flawed.

Common error

Avoid claiming an "inference is invalid" simply because two events are correlated; establish a clear lack of causal link.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "inference is invalid" functions as a judgmental statement, asserting that a particular line of reasoning or conclusion drawn from premises is logically unsound. As Ludwig AI explains, this indicates a flaw in the logical process.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "inference is invalid" is a grammatically sound expression used to denote a flaw in logical reasoning, as Ludwig AI confirms. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, it serves to critique the link between premises and conclusions. To enhance clarity, consider alternatives such as "the reasoning is flawed" or "the conclusion is unwarranted". When deploying this phrase, ensure you can explicitly articulate the deficiency in logical connection. Common pitfalls involve mistaking correlation for causation; make sure to establish genuine logical fallacies before declaring that "inference is invalid".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the reasoning is flawed

Highlights the defects in the reasoning process, similar to pointing out an invalid inference.

the logic is faulty

Pinpoints the error in the logical structure of the argument.

the argument is unsound

Emphasizes that the entire argument, including its premises, does not hold up.

the deduction is incorrect

Specifically targets the deductive reasoning process as being wrong.

the conclusion is unwarranted

Focuses on the conclusion itself being unsupported, rather than the process of inferring.

the connection is tenuous

Emphasizes that the link between premises and conclusions is weak and unreliable.

the assumption is flawed

Highlights that a base assumption that leads to an inference is not correct.

the claim is unsubstantiated

Highlights that a statement has no base to be true.

the link is unsupported

Indicates lack of evidence for a logical connection.

the premise is false

Indicates the root cause of an invalid inference.

FAQs

How can I use "inference is invalid" in a sentence?

You can use "inference is invalid" to describe a situation where a conclusion drawn from certain premises does not logically follow. For example, "The experiment's conclusion is based on a faulty premise; therefore, the inference is invalid".

What are some alternatives to saying "inference is invalid"?

Alternatives include "the conclusion is unwarranted", "the reasoning is flawed", or "the argument is unsound".

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "inference is invalid"?

Use "inference is invalid" when you want to point out a specific flaw in the logical process of drawing a conclusion from given information or premises. It's useful in debates, academic papers, and analytical discussions.

What's the difference between saying "the inference is invalid" and "the conclusion is wrong"?

Saying "the conclusion is wrong" simply states that the final point is incorrect, whereas "the inference is invalid" specifies that the process of reaching the conclusion was flawed, regardless of whether the conclusion is true or false.