'inferable' is a correct and usable word in written English.
It is an adjective that means capable of being inferred or deduced; able to be understood or concluded from evidence or reasoning. Example: The scientist's research findings were inferable from the data collected in the experiment.
There will usually be a chronological gap, sometimes of several centuries, between the archetype, or earliest inferable state of the text, and the original; nearly all manuscripts of classical authors date from the Middle Ages.
Thus in theory the genealogical, or stemmatic, method allows the critic to eliminate from consideration all variants that cannot be traced back to the archetype or earliest inferable textual state.
In both nations, the influence of natural law the idea that laws binding upon humanity are inferable from nature increased, along with the influence of the exact sciences.
"What is frightening about Roe is that this super-protected right," Professor Ely wrote in the Yale Law Journal in 1973, "is not inferable from the language of the Constitution, the framers' thinking respecting the specific problem in issue, any general value derivable from the provisions they included, or the nation's governmental structure".
It is essential that the outcome of the colligation be inferable from the data prior to any testing (Snyder 1997).
Like the logical principle of non-contradiction which controls all rational thought, it expresses, one might say, the pressure of reason and is so far from being empty of significance and force that its form may be regarded as the frame, and its normativity the source, for all the normativity of the substantive first principles and of the moral principles which are inferable from them.
Crummell's natural rights reading not only corrects that idea so that the law ought to bend to pre-existing self-defense rights, but that those rights are inferable from our sentimental nature provides a corollary explanation of precisely why public sympathy arises at all.
This account of probabilities and utilities recognizes their existence in cases where they are not inferable from preferences or their other effects but instead are inferable from their causes, such as an agent's information about objective probabilities, or are not inferable at all (except perhaps by introspection).
Thus it appears that what was important to Whewell was not whether a philosophy of science had been, in fact, inferred from a study of the history of science, but rather, whether a philosophy of science was inferable from it.
Indeed, the obviousness of this is enshrined in the modern logical calculus by the way the inference principle of Existential Instantiation (EI) usually works: from ∃xPx one assumes Pc, where 'c' is a new constant, and reasons on that basis; whatever can be inferred from P(c) (as long as it does not itself contain the new constant 'c') is then taken to be inferable from ∃xPx alone.
