Sentence examples for infer object from inspiring English sources

Several algorithms adapted to problem solvers were developed to automatically infer object descriptions by combining elementary features using construction operators.

This specific picture describes how Apple researchers, including paper authors Yin Zhou and Oncel Tuzel, created something called VoxelNet that can extrapolate and infer objects from a collection of points captured by a LiDAR array.

Perceiving the correct shapes of objects is necessary for inferring object qualities, manipulating tools, avoiding obstacles, and other aspects of functioning successfully in the world.

In the second volume of the Nature of Existence, McTaggart endorsed the view that we never directly perceive material objects, but rather infer material objects from what we directly perceive.[24] So, on McTaggart's view, strictly speaking perception never represents objects as being material objects.[25] Perception, however, does represent the existence of sense-data.

For example, when a variable in an equation stands for a physical quantity, it is easy to infer an object and its attribute corresponding to the quantity is considered (which are physical structure constraints).

Most of the time, the listener has to make do with simply inferring the object of their desire.

Walther and Koch [19] extended Itti's model to infer proto-object regions from individual contrast maps at different spatial scales.

But for those who already know the term, this does not happen by hearing the word "dogs" then deriving or inferring some object that has some peculiar fitness to the word.

Further, it is possible to infer which objects in a scene are important for understanding a given concept and at what point attention is directed towards a given object or the scene as a whole, for example, using multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA), in addition to eye tracking and correlated with measures of behavioral performance across subjects.

Dharmakīrti (cf. Vattanky 1984: 56-8) says that we are licensed to infer that an object has a maker only if we have seen other objects of the same type being made.

Perhaps the reason for this is epistemological: whether our thoughts and sensations are physical or not, the kind of awareness we have of them is of a radically different sort from the kind of awareness we have of the flight of a bird or of a flowing stream, and it seems to be natural to infer that the objects of the one sort of awareness are radically different from the objects of the other.