Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
The measures of each infant were compared with the WHO sex-specific growth standards for age in months and weight-for-length to determine where they fell in the standard percentile distribution [ 5], and the proportion within the 5th percentile estimated.
Similar(59)
The actual birth weight of the infant is compared with its optimal birth weight, and infants whose actual birth weight falls below the 10th or above the 90th centile of the assumed distribution around its target weight are classified as SGA and LGA, respectively.
REM sleep parameters (the amount of REM sleep against the total sleep time, newly designated indices tonic inhibition index (TII) and phasic inhibition index—, and the incidences of gross movements, phasic chin muscle activity (PCMA), and bursts of rapid eye movements) in the six jittery infants were compared with those in age-matched controls.
123 preterm infants were compared to a sample of 25 term infants.
These conservatively treated infants were compared to 38 surgically treated infants of the Hôpital Trousseau, Paris.
Births were stratified into preterm and term groups, and SGA and non-SGA infants were compared within each group.
Infants were compared to an adult group of 13 healthy subjects (6 women, 7 men, mean age: 22.4 ± 1.6 years).
Data derived from infants with diarrhea and from control infants were compared by a two-tailed chi-square or Fisher's exact test.
RSV-infected infants were compared with non-infected infants with regard to the reflex apnoea response to sterile water instilled into the pharynx (laryngeal chemoreflex) during sleep.
The clinical and demographic characteristics of the infants were compared using chi-square test with continuity correction, t-test, and Mann–Whitney U-test where appropriate.
Using multivariate logistic regression and survival analyses to control for GA, SGA and AGA infants were compared for mortality and respiratory morbidity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com