Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
When maternal weight was ≤ 53.8 kg, the mean birth weight of the infant was lower in wood users, although when maternal weight was > 53.8 kg, mean birth weight of neonates did not differ significantly by fuel type.
Similar(59)
In contrast, the rate of episodes among full term infants was lower, 149 178 per 1000 infants.
During treatment, risk of SGA infants was lower in women in the highest tertile of capillary fasting glucose, but there was no relationship with postprandial glucose.
The IAP of women carrying live infants was lower than that of those women with non-viable pregnancies (13.78 2.55 vs. 19.84 1.70, p = 0.0019) (Fig. 1).
The intra-abdominal pressure of those with live infants was lower than that of those with dead ones (13.78 ± 2.554 vs. 19.84 ± 1.695, p = 0.0019).
The mean customised birthweight centile and the rate of LGA infants was higher among women who had a first stage caesarean for failure to progress, and the rate of SGA infants was lower (Table 1).
Our current study not only showed that BMD of preterm infants was lower than that of full term peers, it also provided reference values during the first year for preterm infants.
At delivery, the analysis of mother infant pairs differences revealed that Maasai (low fish) (p = 0.245) and Pare (intermediate fish) (p = 0.091) infants, although insignificant, tended to have higher RBC-DHA than their mothers, while (in contrast) the RBC-DHA of the Sengerema (high fish) infants was lower (p = 0.029) compared to their mothers.
WAZ scores among HIV-infected infants were lower by 0.59 at 6 months and 0.64 at 12 months.
Although parasite densities in infants were lower than those in older children, about half of the infants with malaria were symptomatic.
WAZ scores among in utero infected infants were lower throughout follow-up period of 12 months compared to those infected peripartum or postpartum.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com