Sentence examples for induced no significant differences from inspiring English sources

(Group 1a) induced no significant differences in AA and collagen induced platelet final aggregation between baseline, days 1, 4 and 7 (AA-FA, Figure  1A).

The application of 150 mg clopidogrel bid to lambs over 28 days (Group 2d) induced no significant differences between baseline and days 1, 4, 7 and 28.

The peak occurred at 24 h after nisin was induced (no significant differences in concentrations of pEGF proteins collected at 36 h and 48 h compared with 24 h, data not shown).

The dark-adapted white flash stimuli induced no significant difference (p > 0.05) in implicit time between control and affected sheep.

The LBP plus TNFα + IFNγ + LPS and LBP induced no significant difference in GFAP level, compared to TNFα + IFNγ + LPS and vehicle group, respectively.

Incubation with exosomes from healthy volunteers induced no significant difference in developed tension (3.08 ± 0.61 g/mm2 pre vs 2.95 ± 0.72 g/mm2 post, n = 4, P = NS) and in positive time-tension derivative (34.18 ± 6.03 g/mm/s pre vs 34.45 ± 6.75 g/mm/s post, n = 4, P = NS).

[ 24] in studies with 2 groups of cows fed either a negative or positive dietary cation-anion difference (DCAD) observed constant plasma magnesium concentration in EDTA induced hypocalcaemia and no significant differences were observed in plasma inorganic phosphate concentration due to the dietary treatments.

In contrast to CLP-induced peritonitis, peritonitis induced by 2% glycogen exhibited no significant differences in the number of neutrophils infiltrated into the peritoneal cavities between the wild-type and those of the P/I null mice at 6 hours.

Astrocytes, which comprise the majority of the population of large cells [50] (population R1, inset Figure 5A), spontaneously expressed more MHC class I, which was highly induced by IFN-γ but no significant differences were seen between the two genotypes.

For proof of principle, we compared electrically and mechanically induced AP conduction and found no significant differences in propagation speed and patterns, or Vm to CaT peak delay.

Our results are in accordance with the first proposition, since we reported only 2 graft losses in the ATG induced group and no significant difference was detected in acute rejection between patients with and without ATG induction.