Presumably haecceities would not be needed to explain indivisibility, since everything — whether particular or universal — is indivisible in the required sense (numerically indivisible; numerically identical in anything in which it exists).
("Analogous to," because the relevant property would explain distinction but not indivisibility, on the grounds that the persons are exemplifications of an indivisible essence — of an essence that is numerically the same in each of them.
A specific difference is something indivisible into further species, and, indeed, explanatory of a species's indivisibility into further species (Scotus, Ordinatio II, d. 3, p. 1, qq. 5 6, n. 177 (Scotus [OO], 7 478; Spade (1994), 103 104)).
The physical indivisibility of the atoms seems to be independent of the argument for indivisible magnitudes, since the solidity of atoms the fact that there is no void within them is said to be the reason why they cannot be split.
The government in Madrid insists that this is illegal under the constitution, which declares the indivisibility of the nation.France's constitution brusquely defines French as the language of the Republic.
Why?Such beliefs are rooted in Islam's horror of idolatry, and generally of anything that could come between man and God, or compromise the uniqueness and indivisibility of God.
Spain's indivisibility is underwritten by the constitution of 1978 endorsed by an overwhelming majority of Spaniards and that's that.
Please find more details in Amnesty's report on migrant workers in China.Amnesty's assistance to WOZA in Zimbabwe shows the very core of this approach: the indivisibility of human rights.
It rightly speaks to the indivisibility of all rights — that, as Camus once put it, taking away one's bread suppresses one's freedom, just as taking away one's freedom suppresses one's ability to demand bread.Sumi DhanarajanOxford.
By agreeing, as he apparently did, to Palestinian sovereignty over several Arab neighbourhoods within the municipal border, Mr Barak has tacitly dropped Israel's long insistence on the city's indivisibility, the mantra that it should remain "united forever under Israeli sovereignty".
For this reason it saw, for example, hardly any difference between the systems of Gassendi and Descartes, although the latter explicitly rejected some of the fundamentals of Democritus, such as the existence of the void and the indivisibility of the atoms, as noted above.
