Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
individuals without
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "individuals without" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it when referring to people lacking a specific quality, resource, or characteristic. Example: "The program aims to support individuals without access to healthcare." Alternative expressions include "people lacking," "persons without," and "individuals lacking."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Individuals without insurance can rarely cover charges of this magnitude".
News & Media
We wouldn't share data about individuals without their explicit consent.
News & Media
Individuals without health insurance affect all of us, just as individuals without car insurance do.
News & Media
"It wouldn't be Pride without the individuals, without the community groups, and without the corporate sponsors".
News & Media
This acquisition gives MONY access to more high-net-worth individuals without a big capital investment".
News & Media
It would also provide coverage for individuals without children who are within the existing poverty level.
News & Media
The bill would impose a new "tax on individuals without acceptable health care coverage".
News & Media
Here in Los Angeles, officers frequently arrest individuals without photo identification for trivial offenses like jaywalking.
News & Media
They can raise money from corporations, organizations and wealthy individuals without the contribution limits that parties and campaigns have.
News & Media
But they never say how democracy is served by electing individuals without party to define what they stand for.
News & Media
Of a show about four venal, navel-gazing, pathologically narcissistic individuals without a single redeeming feature among them?
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "individuals without", ensure that the context clearly defines what is lacking. This avoids ambiguity and enhances clarity for the reader.
Common error
Avoid using "individuals without" in overly casual settings where simpler terms like "people without" would suffice. Match the formality of your language to your audience and context.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "individuals without" primarily functions as a descriptive phrase used to categorize or identify a group of people based on the absence of a specific attribute or resource. Ludwig AI shows the phrase is widely used in different contexts.
Frequent in
Science
35%
News & Media
33%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "individuals without" is a versatile and commonly used phrase to specify a group lacking a particular attribute or resource. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and prevalent across various formal and informal contexts. It's particularly common in scientific, news, and business domains, used to highlight specific needs or deficiencies within a population. While alternatives like "people lacking" exist, "individuals without" maintains a level of formality that's generally appropriate for professional and academic settings. When crafting your message remember that clarity about the lacking attribute is essential and to align your language formality with your audience.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
those without
A shorter, more concise alternative, directly stating the absence.
individuals lacking
Similar to "people lacking" but uses the more formal term "individuals".
people lacking
Focuses on the deficiency or absence of a specific attribute in a group.
members without
Used when referring to members of a group who lack a specific quality.
persons devoid of
Emphasizes a complete absence or lack, often used in more formal contexts.
those not having
A more literal and direct way of expressing the absence of something.
subjects not possessing
A formal way to indicate that certain subjects do not have something.
those deficient in
Highlights a deficiency, implying something is missing or insufficient.
citizens lacking
Specifies a group (citizens) who do not possess a certain attribute or resource.
parties unequipped with
More formal and emphasizes a lack of necessary equipment or resources.
FAQs
How can I use "individuals without" in a sentence?
You can use "individuals without" to describe people who lack a certain characteristic, resource, or attribute. For example, "The study focused on individuals without health insurance."
What are some alternatives to "individuals without"?
Alternatives include "people lacking", "those without", or "persons devoid of", depending on the context and level of formality required.
Is "individuals without" formal or informal?
"Individuals without" is generally considered more formal than "people without", but it is appropriate in a wide range of contexts, especially in professional or academic writing.
When should I use "individuals without" versus "people without"?
Use "individuals without" in formal documents, reports, or academic papers where precision and a professional tone are important. In more casual settings, "people without" is perfectly acceptable.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested