Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Individuals were omitted if their SNP call rate was <80%.
It is therefore important to know whether individuals were omitted, and how many were omitted.
Individuals were omitted if their SNP call rate was <65% (1 SD below the average).
† Not all individuals had data for each variable, in these cases these individuals were omitted from the test.
Nineteen taxa comprising only 45 individuals were omitted, because their accidental occurrence introduced a large number of zeros in the data matrix, without providing relevant information about changes in the assemblage.
Similar(55)
1611, which related to treatment of lands partitioned to the Navajo Tribe or to the Hopi Tribe and protection of rights and property of individuals, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Of these, genotyping on eight individuals was omitted from analysis due to sample mishandling.
Total energy intake was used as the criterion to determine if the FFQ was completed adequately, and in this study, this resulted in 18 individuals being omitted as outliers (Willett 1998).
$$\end{document} For simplicity, the subscripts standing for an individual were omitted.
Genotypes of one individual were omitted due to a call rate of < 90%.
Redundant (99% identical or higher) ITS region sequences within each individual were omitted from the alignments, leaving 188 sequences for phylogenetic analysis.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com