Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
In cluster 2, nineteen out of the twenty individuals were morphologically S. schwerinii and one was a S. viminalis × S.
Some of the admixed individuals were morphologically not distinguishable from pure individuals of one or the other of the parental species.
For the Dave B House population, 7 of 33 individuals were morphologically autogenous, but only 1 (14%) was assigned to Cluster M and the remaining mosquitoes had q values < 0.80 and were not assigned to a cluster.
Similar(57)
We confirmed that all individuals are morphologically Cyrtognatha, although we were not able to identify most species.
As postulated by Schaeffer-Novelli et al. [21], those individuals are morphologically distinct, having a tree-like structure in the riverside location (RS Figuree 1B) and a shrub-like morphology near the salt marsh (SM; Figure 1C).
Some wild individuals are morphologically similar to the 'managed in situ' group and vice versa.
Such overlap indicates that some wild and managed in situ individuals are morphologically similar, even when provenance of those similar phenotypes is from different sites.
This individual was morphologically indistinguishable from L. luscinia and represents a backcross or later-generation hybrid.
We found several individuals that were morphologically intermediate between Q. robur and Q. pubescens and, indeed, some of them (e.g., individual 67) were putative genetic hybrids (Table 2).
In contrast, some individuals that were morphologically and, based on nDNA, assigned to a given species displayed haplotypes that were shared with (or closer to haplotypes observed in) other species (Table 4).
In northwest and central Missouri, Gloyd [ 17] and Evans and Gloyd [ 18] identified populations containing individuals that were morphologically intermediate between two subspecies (S. c. catenatus and S. c. tergeminus) with adjacent distributions to the east and west, respectively, of these populations (see Gibbs et al. [ 19] for a complete description of the possible hybrid zone).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com