Results from the assignment test showed that 85.00% of all individuals were assigned to the population they were sampled from (Table 7).
Taken together, the high accuracy indicates that of those individuals assigned to a given class the majority were assigned correctly (i.e., little false assignment bias), while the high efficiency suggests that most individuals were assigned.
Before the American invasion, intelligence agencies drew up lists of most wanted Iraqis, including a classified "black list" in which individuals were assigned particular numbers.
All the selected individuals were assigned randomly to either the intervention group or control group (16 to the intervention and 17 to the control group).
Novices and excitable individuals were assigned the calmest horses; I, an intermediate rider whom Jillian sized up as "not likely to get upset in a hurry," was assigned a chestnut-colored Australian stock horse named Molly.
Similarly, efficiencies (Supplementary Figures 1 and 2) were above 90% for posterior probability of assignments thresholds between 0.5 and 0.8 (used in this analysis), suggesting the majority of individuals were assigned.
Individuals were assigned to either an experimental condition that trained with stroboscopic eyewear or to a control condition that underwent identical training with non-stroboscopic eyewear.
In each situation, individuals were assigned to either group of claims on the basis of their results in a knowledge quiz.
It used to be that individuals were assigned each department or major agency.
After the intake process was completed, individuals were assigned to meet with and discuss their issue with an attorney on a one-on-one basis.
Individuals were assigned to one of two groups: those 'better off', and those 'worse off'.
