Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(10)
To determine whether removing bacteria affected body mass in uninfected individuals, we compared mean proportion of body mass lost in treatments Bac+Bd− and Bac−Bd− using a t-test.
To examine if individuals responded differently in interactions with sibling and non-sibling individuals we compared the inter-individual distance for different pairs of interacting captive reared adult male (N = 35 pairs) and female (N = 47 pairs) pygmy grasshopper individuals that were either siblings or non-siblings.
For a subset of individuals, we compared the computed haplotypes with experimental haplotypes identified by amplicon cloning and sequencing [ 2].
After checking the CD status of individuals, we compared their classification from using only HLA in the model to using HLA plus GRS_26.
To determine the background level of similarity between unrelated individuals, we compared the same tissue between 79 different random pairs of unrelated subjects.
In order to quantify the degree of consistency among individuals, we compared the individual editing levels of the 6 different sites in the FLNA, CYFIP2, BLCAP, KLRD1, CARD11 and FYN genes.
Similar(50)
CNVRs for all groups were generated based on the similar approach we used before but instead of 16 individual we compared only individuals present in the particular group.
For each individual, we compared the observed distribution of the proportion of mapped reads coming from the reference allele to the expected distribution assuming symmetric binomial sampling.
For each individual, we compared their DNA and mRNA sequences to identify editing and other types of RDDs (Chen et al., 2012; Ju et al., 2011; Li et al., 2011).
In order to ensure that we had accurate estimates not just of the presence but also of the degree of heteroplasmy in an individual, we compared the degree of heteroplasmy called from the ∼100× coverage of mtDNA sequence against that called from ∼500× coverage from PCR amplified mtDNA (in 72 individuals).
To predict the communities of individual users we compared individual word usage with community word usage to select the best matching community (see Figure 3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com