Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(53)
In some of its worst forms (being invisible, manipulative and exclusionary, not offering choice, furthering inequality and ignoring individuality and individual justice in pursuit of rationality and efficiency across many cases), ambient intelligence reflects 1984.
Individual justice is not a concern much in evidence at the Supreme Court these days.
Rademacher raises profound questions about individual justice against a background of mass murder.
Individual justice ideology scores, which are based on voting patterns, also illustrate the court's leftward shift.
And what could be more 'progressive' than the belief that the law should aim for social, not merely individual, justice?
There is, however, a price to pay for playing unprincipled realpolitik with a question of individual justice, as Mrs Merkel is finding out.
Similar(7)
It inevitably engages the moral sensibility of the individual justices.
The official transcript does not identify the individual justices who ask questions.
Depending on the individual Justices, clerks have varying input in the shaping of the written opinions.
The scores for individual justices can change over time if their voting behavior changes.
Applications involving more mundane matters are also submitted to individual justices.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com