The phrase "individual harm" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the impact or consequences that affect a single person, often in contexts related to health, safety, or legal matters.
Example: "The study aimed to assess the potential for individual harm resulting from the new policy changes."
Alternatives: "personal injury" or "single victim impact".
After all, how much individual harm could a course of antibiotics do?
The annual strategic analysis also examines the wider ramifications beyond the individual harm caused by the illicit drug market in Europe, with citizens spending an estimated €24bn (£19bn) every year on illicit drugs.
With this approach, plaintiffs could avoid the need to show individual harm to a voter in a specific district because Democrats are located all around the state — and could emphasize statewide metrics about partisan bias.
The scientists, including members of the government's top advisory committee on drug classification, have produced a rigorous assessment of the social and individual harm caused by 20 substances, and believe this should form the basis of any future ranking.
Holland claims that the specific challenge in public health ethics is the dilemma between protecting and promoting the health of populations and the risk of causing individual harm and costs (Holland 2014).
Bias exists in many business models to minimize risk assessments, and optimize targeting opportunities and while they may produce profitable business results, they have been known to result in unintended consequences that cause individual harm and deepen economic disparities.
They had also suffered individual harms, the plaintiffs alleged.
However, the individual harms and social burdens associated with early exposure to simulated gambling activities currently are not well understood.
The remedies in which the Court finds comfort were never designed to afford relief for individual harms.
You know that district attorneys prosecute crimes against people and property to keep our communities safe, redress individual harms, deter future crimes and potentially rehabilitate criminal offenders.
The American Academy of Pediatrics has asserted: "Constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion do not permit children to be harmed through religious practices, nor do they allow religion to be a valid legal defense when an individual harms or neglects a child".
