Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
As expected, individual plant size affected individual fruit number and individual fruit set (Table 2B).
Individual fruit number did not vary with NND irrespective of whether or not individual plant size was included in the analysis of covariance (Table 2A-B, Fig. 2a).
Within populations, individual fruit number did not change, and individual fruit set increased independent of plant size, in response to increasing NND.
Both individual fruit number and individual fruit set increased, independent of plant size, with increases in LNS within a 0.1 m radius, but did not change with increases in LNS within radii of between 0.1 m and 0.2 m radii or between 0.2 m and 0.3 m.
Similar(56)
In the present study we have shown that introduction of the DefH9-iaaM gene construct causes a significant increase in fruit production which results from an increase in individual fruit weight, an increased number of fruits per inflorescence and an increased number of inflorescences per plant.
This should incorporate the effects of potential tradeoffs between the pericarp thickness of individual fruits and the number of fruits produced.
Both fruit number and single fruit mass were higher in the open stand, though the difference was not significant owing to large variations among individuals.
We then included individual plant size as a covariate in each of the analyses to assess whether LNS had effects on fruit number or fruit set when differences in individual plant size were accounted for.
We first used analyses of covariance to analyze fruit number and fruit set of selected individuals as a function of population (random factor) and NND (covariate).
If P m is greater than a random number within (0,1), the two probability amplitudes of X-coordinate or Y-coordinate of the individual fruit fly randomly selected will be exchanged by quantum not gate.
Vegetative propagation technique varies with the individual fruit plant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com