Sentence examples for individual discrepancies from inspiring English sources

Model values are generally in standard deviation limits of both data sets but some individual discrepancies exist in the case of the DE-2 data.

But on all these topics, if we ever see individual discrepancies or problems, we work to fix them, because Google has always sought to be a great employer, for every one of our employees".

Despite the overall similarity between BXD and F2 mouse panels, individual discrepancies are noted: The panels differ for Me7 ic and Me7 ip transmissions at the P<0.01 level.

This may account for individual discrepancies between these results (in addition to methodological and environmental/epigenetic considerations) although, common regions on chromosomes 4 and 8 indicate a broader similarity between their findings.

BXD traits values are derived from strain means thus, given the high reliability scores associated with these values (data not shown), it is more likely that individual discrepancies are the result of greater phenotyping error among F2s.

Although GSCs share extensive similarities, individual discrepancies should be noted.

Individual discrepancy counts remained higher in retracted reports than unretracted reports (median 5 (interquartile range 3-8.75 3-8.75 (0-4.75); P<0.001).

For each individual, discrepancy between the number of FES with NumtS and the corresponding number of validated NumtS is due to the different coverage of NumtS loci in FES.

Here we modify the original method of, which looks at discrepancy only in respect to P, and instead define discrepancy as the minimum of the individual discrepancy scores found from P and P′, to remove any bias towards row or column nodes.

As previously discussed and considering just DBDs that do not share the divergent set 1, the position 188 present some less frequent modifications, or as part of an alternative group (the case for the P188 of the 3-keto-steroid receptors) or as an individual discrepancy (as for the R188 of HNF4).

The absolute difference between conventional change scores and patient perceived change score (with and without adjustment for recall bias) are presented in Table 3. Within individuals, discrepancy between conventional longitudinal change and patient perceived change was considered clinically meaningful for 84 (83.2%) of participants, after adjusting for recall bias this reduced to 8 (7.9%).