individual accountable for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "individual accountable for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing responsibility or liability assigned to a specific person in a particular context, such as in a workplace or legal setting. Example: "Each team member is an individual accountable for their own tasks and deadlines."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

For any board, the single most important work it does is selecting its chief executive and holding that individual accountable for the organization's performance.

The New York Times

Mr Cosby's solution to the problem holding each individual accountable for his or her behaviour regardless of race is not blaming the victim.

The Economist

Judges, in some cases, have prevented lawyers from telling juries about the payment arrangements for fear that it could prejudice a jury — some jurors might hold an individual accountable for something they project onto the corporation paying the bill while other jurors might side with the individual because the payment suggest the corporation stands behind them.

The New York Times

Most are composed by in-house publishing teams, with no individual accountable for the final product.

Science Magazine

21 23 However, the relationship between the patient and the medical sphere exists within a socially constructed hierarchy wherein medical institutions ultimately hold the individual accountable for collective social problems.

BMJ Open

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

We can hold individuals accountable for bad choices without limiting everyone's freedom.

The New York Times

He has predetermined human destiny yet justly holds individuals accountable for their choices in life.

Encyclopedia Britannica

By focusing on holding individuals accountable for human rights violations, the organizers said they believed they could make inroads.

The New York Times

For anyone hoping to hold firms and individuals accountable for misconduct in the credit crisis, valuation practices are a rich vein to mine.

The New York Times

In a rare instance of seeking to hold individuals accountable for company misdeeds, the Justice Department also filed criminal charges against three BP employees in connection with the accident.

The New York Times

Whether a bank is "too big to jail" is not relevant to determining how to hold individuals accountable for corporate misconduct.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "individual accountable for", clearly define the specific actions or outcomes for which the individual is responsible to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "individual accountable for" in contexts where the responsibility is shared among a team or group. Specify if it applies only to a single person.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "individual accountable for" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun (often a person or role) by specifying their obligation or responsibility. It is used to assign responsibility for specific tasks, outcomes, or behaviors. Ludwig examples confirm this usage.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

30%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "individual accountable for" is a grammatically correct phrase used to designate responsibility to a specific person. While Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, it is relatively rare in usage. It is most commonly found in news, science, and business contexts where clearly defined roles are essential. Alternative phrases, such as ""person responsible for"", can be used to convey a similar meaning. When using the phrase, be specific about the responsibilities being assigned to avoid ambiguity. Although the phrase can be used for general purposes, it is generally reserved for formal or professional contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

person responsible for

Replaces "accountable" with "responsible", offering a more direct synonym.

party liable for

Substitutes "accountable" with "liable", indicating legal responsibility.

individual held responsible

Changes the structure to passive voice, emphasizing the act of holding someone responsible.

person in charge of

Focuses on the aspect of being in control and therefore accountable.

designated responsible individual

Adds specificity by indicating a formal designation of responsibility.

duty bearer

Uses formal language to denote someone with a specific obligation.

the one responsible

Simplifies the phrase to emphasize the person bearing the responsibility.

individual bearing responsibility

Emphasizes the act of carrying the burden of responsibility.

accountable agent

Shortens the phrase while retaining the core meaning of accountability.

the responsible party

Generalizes the phrase to include any entity bearing responsibility.

FAQs

How can I use "individual accountable for" in a sentence?

You can use "individual accountable for" to assign responsibility to a specific person. For instance, "The project manager is the "person responsible for" ensuring the project is completed on time."

What is a good alternative to "individual accountable for"?

A suitable alternative is ""person responsible for"", which conveys a similar meaning of obligation and duty.

Is it better to say "individual accountable for" or "individual responsible for"?

Both "individual accountable for" and "individual responsible for" are correct and often interchangeable. The choice depends on the context and desired level of formality. The phrase "individual responsible for" is slightly more common in general usage.

What does it mean to hold an individual accountable?

To hold an individual accountable means to ensure they are responsible for their actions and the consequences thereof, and that they are expected to answer for them. It implies a system of oversight and potential repercussions for failing to meet expectations or violating standards.