indirect effects

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "indirect effects" is correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to the consequences or repercussions of an action or event that are not immediately obvious or direct. Example: The new policy had several direct effects, such as increased productivity and morale among employees. However, it also had several indirect effects, including a decrease in customer satisfaction due to longer wait times.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It also has indirect effects.

The Economist

The indirect effects were much larger.

The New Yorker

Some indirect effects could be larger.

The Economist

Then there are the indirect effects.

University of California, Berkeley

But its application can be complicated, with indirect effects.

The New York Times

Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects.

Columbia University

Indirect effects upon interstate commerce do not invalidate the act.

Cornell University

Economists disagree on the indirect effects on employment over time.

University of California, Berkeley

In addition, different indirect effects were tested.

Journal of Vocational Behavior

and How significant are indirect effects?

Forest Ecology and Management

There are also potential indirect effects.

Improving Farmed Fish Quality and Safety

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing complex systems or events, clearly differentiate between direct and "indirect effects" to provide a comprehensive understanding of the situation. This clarifies the causal relationships and potential long-term impacts.

Common error

Avoid only focusing on immediate results. "Indirect effects" often accumulate over time and can significantly alter outcomes, potentially overshadowing the initial direct impacts. Consider these long-term consequences in your analysis.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "indirect effects" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as the subject or object of a sentence. It refers to consequences or outcomes that are not immediately or obviously caused by a particular action or event, as supported by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "indirect effects" is grammatically sound and frequently used to describe consequences that are not immediately apparent. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and common usage across various contexts, including science, news, and academia. While direct effects are the obvious and immediate outcomes, "indirect effects" capture the ripple or knock-on consequences that contribute to a more comprehensive understanding. Using alternatives like "secondary impacts" or "downstream consequences" can add nuance to your writing, but understanding the subtle differences in meaning is crucial. Remember to consider both direct and "indirect effects" for a well-rounded analysis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

secondary impacts

Focuses on the impacts that follow the initial or primary effects.

downstream consequences

Emphasizes the consequences that occur later in a chain of events.

knock-on effects

Highlights effects that trigger further, often unforeseen, consequences.

unintended consequences

Specifically refers to effects that were not originally intended or anticipated.

ripple effects

Suggests effects that spread outward from an initial event, like ripples in water.

collateral impacts

Indicates impacts that occur alongside the primary ones, often negative.

secondary ramifications

Highlights the more distant and complex consequences.

derivative impacts

Focuses on impacts derived or resulting from something else.

ensuing effects

Refers to effects that happen as a result of a prior event.

unforeseen repercussions

Emphasizes the unexpected and often negative nature of the effects.

FAQs

How can I use "indirect effects" in a sentence?

You can use "indirect effects" to describe consequences that are not immediately obvious or directly caused by an action. For example, "The new policy had several "direct effects", such as increased productivity, but also had several "indirect effects", including decreased employee satisfaction."

What are some alternatives to "indirect effects"?

Some alternatives to "indirect effects" include "secondary impacts", "downstream consequences", or "knock-on effects", depending on the specific context.

How do "indirect effects" differ from direct effects?

"Indirect effects" are consequences that occur as a result of a primary action, but are not the immediate or intended outcome. Direct effects are the immediate and intended results of an action. For example, the direct effect of a tax cut might be increased disposable income, while an indirect effect could be increased consumer spending.

Why is it important to consider "indirect effects"?

Considering "indirect effects" provides a more complete understanding of the true impact of an action or event. Overlooking these effects can lead to inaccurate assessments and potentially harmful decisions, as the full consequences may not be immediately apparent.