Sentence examples for indices of sensitivity from inspiring English sources

k 1, 0) and k 0, 0) are the quality indices of sensitivity and specificity, respectively, defined as.

We transformed the numbers of true positive, false positive, false negative, and true negative based on the provided indices of sensitivity, specificity, and sample size values for statistical calculation.

Non-parametric indices of sensitivity A′ and bias B′D, and robust analysis of variance were, both conceptually and methodologically, the most suitable for separately measuring sensory and decision processes in the context of olive oil tasting.

Considering the fact that the maximum value of the quality indices k 1, 0) and k 0, 0) is equal to 1, the denominator in Equation 15 takes the form: W1 · P · Q' + W2 · P' · Q. Dividing both numerator and denominator by W1 + W2, the final expression of the weighted kappa coefficient, in accordance with the quality indices of sensitivity and specificity, becomes (16).

Standard epidemiological approaches were used to calculate diagnostic indices of sensitivity and specificity.

For diabetes, overall estimates were produced for each of the indices of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and κ.

Ahmad et al. reported duplex PCR application as an accurate tool for identification and differentiation of C. albicans and C. dubliniensis, with a very high index of sensitivity and specificity (Ahmad et al. 2012).

On the basis of the proportional data, we calculated d-prime as the index of sensitivity, which can be separated from the index of criterion or response bias [24] (Figure 3).

For each block the following four dependent variables were used: 1) hit rate or number of correct responses, 2) false alarm rate or number of errors of commission 3) response criterion, which reflects the amount of perceptual evidence required prior to responding to a stimulus as a target, and 4) d', a non-parametric signal detection index of sensitivity, a measure of target detection.

The index of sensitivity was between 92.4% and 94.5% for fox samples, and reached 83% for domestic carnivores [ 18].

We therefore used d' as an index of sensitivity to lexical status, and compared relative levels of sensitivity between the language groups.