Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
Habitat classifications of the same set of 41 sites based on 6 abiotic variables and abundances of 89 taxa and bioturbation indicators were compared using correlation, regression and ordination analyses.
Clinicopathological indicators were compared using χ-test, whereas continuous variables were compared using the Student's t-test.
Similar(58)
Finally results for the multi-indicator and single indicator system were compared using untrained readers to demonstrate the improvements in accuracy achieved with the new system.
The changes in NLCA indicators from 2009 to 2011 were compared using an independent t-test.
These methods were compared using evaluation indicators, and the backward elimination method was selected.
Revenues from electricity sales, FITs and CERs were compared using financial indicators to measure their relative contributions on profitability.
Cohort characteristics and indicators for testing at first presentation were compared using Fisher's exact or Mann-Whitney U tests.
For facilities assessed by both survey methods, the indicator scores produced by each method were compared using Spearman's correlation coefficients and linear regression analysis with generalized estimating equations.
Averaged data were compared using t-test.
Proportions were compared using chi-square tests.
Proportions were compared using Chi-square test.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com