Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(9)
The level of risk for four broad indicators was determined by interviews with relevant stakeholders.
Percentage weight of fields and indicators was determined on the basis of their significance, according to mathematical method.
The diagnostic performance of these combined indicators was determined as described above.
Based on these results, the definitive set of quality indicators was determined.
The evidence base for reported process indicators was determined, and meta-analysis was undertaken for studies with sufficient similarity.
Conformity of quality-of-care indicators was determined according to targets defined by international guidelines, whenever available.
Similar(51)
Overall, the three indicators were determined appropriate for this study.
The values of these indicators were determined using the UK National Nuclear Laboratory's fuel cycle modelling code ORION.
Bivariate correlations between the indicators were determined by calculating the Spearman's Rho coefficient using the raw enumeration data.
Two distinct sets of fault indicators are determined, one for fault detection, he other one for fault isolation.
Two distinct sets of fault indicators are determined, one for fault detection, the other one for fault isolation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com